The 5G debacle shows how poor governance threatens aviation and innovation


The US aviation industry came to a near standstill earlier this month due to last-minute notice from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and airlines. objection to the deployment of 5G in the mid-spectrum. Although the FAA skepticism 5G security has played a major role, ineffective governance and poor management of inter-agency conflicts, especially under the Trump administration, have been key factors in this debacle. Policymakers must grapple with the challenges that poor federal oversight poses to technological innovation and the future of U.S. leadership in 5G-enabled technologies.

After performing a detailed technical analysis and consulting with the FAA, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) erased AT&T and Verizon will roll out their 5G networks in the mid-spectrum in December 2021. Although they had many opportunities to express objections earlier, the FAA and Airlines companies issued a last-minute warning that mid-band waves would interfere with aircraft altimeters (altitude instruments), without providing evidence for such claims.

However, the international experience suggests that 5G midband deployment and aeronautical systems can coexist without harmful interference. Despite some differences in radio frequency and power, almost 40 countries have allocated medium wave spectra for 5G use without any significant instances of interference. Additionally, US aviation systems use a communications system called Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications (WAIC), which operated in the same spectrum as radio altimeters with no known signal. example harmful interference.

To support its claims of harmful interference, the FAA relied on a report from the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA), which industry experts have critical as being “conservative” and lacking “sufficient evidence” for his alleged interference. Several countries, including France and Norway, conducted tests that concluded that 5G and aeronautical systems can coexist without harmful interference. Despite an offer from National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to test civilian aircraft equipment, the FAA would have been reluctant to carry out such tests because they would not play a significant role. Furthermore, FCC decisions are often sued, but neither the FAA nor any airline to fileD object to mid-band spectrum allocation.

After nearly causing major flight disruptions, the FAA last week cleared 78 percent of planes to land in airports with 5G C-band. But he should have rated altimeters for safety in February 2020, when the FCC approved C-band spectrum for 5G — or no later than February 2021, when the FCC auctioned 5G medium-wave bands to telcos. Instead, the FAA waited until the last minute to approve the altimeters, a result that would even have been less likely without the intervention of the transport secretary Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegButtigieg targets rising road deaths The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – Biden speaks, Senate balks Airlines suspend US flights in response to 5G PLUS rollout. Nonetheless, earlier intervention by the Biden administration would have helped avoid disruption and uncertainty for airline passengers and telecommunications users.

The problem goes beyond the FAA’s opposition to 5G midrange spectrum. The NTIA, a branch of the Department of Commerce, contact details telecommunications policies between the White House and the executive agencies responsible for spectrum policy. Although the Trump administration has publicly underline importance of 5G in the context of US-China strategic competition, NTIA lack timely develop a national spectrum policy. After NTIA chief resigned abruptly in May 2019 after criticize the Trump administration’s 5G policy, four leaders turned during the last 20 months of the Trump presidency, undermine NTIA’s role in managing interagency communications.

Like the New York Times reports, the FAA’s midrange spectrum memorandum hasn’t even reached the FCC and telcos, especially as the Trump administration’s attention has turned to the election results. In other words, the Trump administration’s stated commitment to 5G technologies has proven to be little in practice.

Additionally, some of the $82 billion Proceeds from the 5G spectrum allocation could have been earmarked for deploying technical solutions to further reduce the possibility of harmful interference, such as upgrading altimeters on some aircraft and creating buffer zones around airports. Instead, as former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler writing, the Trump administration’s decision not to earmark proceeds from the sale could pose an additional challenge in paying for technical upgrades that may ultimately be needed to avoid harmful 5G interference.

Although the standoff between the FAA and the FCC has been temporarily resolved, the interference issue will return when the telecommunications companies to start using 5G networks around airports and the FAA keep on going its examination of aeronautical systems.

Answering these questions will require leadership that values ​​empirical evidence rather than the unsubstantiated claims of a particular agency or industry. The Biden administration and FCC and FAA leaders must work together to ensure that interagency conflicts and poor governance do not impede a smooth rollout of America’s 5G networks — and the states’ global competitiveness. United.

Ryan Nabil is a research fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington, DC


About Author

Comments are closed.